Which of the following is a good reason to use experience-based testing?

Using experience-based testing is an effective approach for several reasons, and one of the most compelling is that this type of testing can uncover defects that might not be detected through more structured, formal testing techniques. Experienced testers bring a wealth of knowledge and intuition gained from previous projects and interactions with systems, enabling them to identify potential problem areas based on past experiences. This intuition often allows them to focus on scenarios that may be overlooked by a strictly formal method.

Experience-based testing leverages the tester’s familiarity with user behavior, application nuances, and previous issues encountered in similar projects. Such insights often lead to discovering defects arising from atypical usage patterns or complex interactions within the software, which may not surface under systematic testing methods. Thus, the combination of knowledge and creativity in experience-based testing plays a significant role in enhancing the overall quality assurance process.

While other options present valid points about experience-based testing—such as targeting user experiences or addressing issues that users may encounter—these aspects are more about derived benefits rather than the primary strength of the approach, which lies in its ability to reveal intricate defects through a combative understanding of real-world usage and potential pitfalls.